Home  ›  Sign of Contradiction: Contraception, Family Planning, and Catholicism

Sign of Contradiction: Contraception, Family Planning, and Catholicism

Written By viernes, 4 de marzo de 2022 Add Comment Edit

Catholic theology of sexuality, like Cosmic theology in full general, is drawn from natural law,[ane] approved scripture, divine revelation, and sacred tradition, as interpreted authoritatively by the magisterium of the Catholic Church. Sexual morality evaluates sexual behavior according to standards laid out by Catholic moral theology, and often provides general principles past which Catholics tin evaluate whether specific deportment see these standards.

The Church teaches that sexual intercourse has a two-fold unitive and procreative purpose;[2] According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, "conjugal dear ... aims at a deeply personal unity, a unity that, beyond union in one flesh, leads to forming i heart and soul",[3] since the marriage bail is to be a sign of the dear between God and humanity.[4]

Considering Catholics believe God establish everything he created to be "very good",[v] the Catholic Church teaches that the man body and sexual practice must likewise be proficient. Every person is created in the image of God and therefore has great dignity including their sexuality.[6] Sexuality is non something purely biological; rather, it concerns the intimate nucleus of the person.[7]

In cases in which sexual expression is sought exterior marriage, or in which the procreative function of sexual expression inside marriage is deliberately frustrated (e.g., the use of artificial contraception), the Catholic Church building expresses its business organization. Among what are considered sins gravely contrary to guiltlessness are masturbation, fornication, pornography, and homosexual practices.[viii] Additionally, "infidelity, divorce, polygamy, and free union are grave offenses confronting the dignity of marriage".[nine]

Natural law [edit]

Natural law (Latin: lex naturalis) refers to the utilise of reason to analyze human nature to deduce binding rules of moral behavior from God's cosmos of reality and mankind. "The natural law is written and engraved in the soul of each and every man, considering it is human reason ordaining him to do good and forbidding him to sin."[1] It is chosen "Natural", considering the reason which decrees it properly belongs to human nature. Its primary precepts are establish in the Ten Commandments.

In the Summa Theologica, St. Thomas Aquinas wrote: "...the rational animal is subject field to Divine providence in the most excellent way, in so far as it partakes of a share of providence, past being provident both for itself and for others. Wherefore information technology has a share of the Eternal Reason, whereby it has a natural inclination to its proper human action and cease: and this participation of the eternal law in the rational creature is chosen the natural police force.[10]

Scripture [edit]

The Genesis creation narratives provide insights into anthropology that inform Catholic theology of sexuality. The following verses are oft cited in Catholic studies of sexual morality:

  • 1:27: "And God created homo to his own paradigm: to the paradigm of God he created him: male and female person he created them."[xi]
  • 2:21–25: "Then the Lord God cast a deep sleep upon Adam: and when he was fast asleep, he took one of his ribs, and filled upwards flesh for it. And the Lord God built the rib which he took from Adam into a woman: and brought her to Adam. And Adam said: This now is bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man. Wherefore a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they shall be two in one mankind. And they were both naked: to wit, Adam and his married woman: and were not ashamed."[12]
  • 3:sixteen: "To the woman too he said: I will multiply thy sorrows, and thy conceptions: in sorrow shalt g bring forth children, and 1000 shalt be under thy married man'southward power, and he shall have dominion over thee."[13]

Two of the Ten Commandments directly address sexual morality, forbidding adultery[xiv] [fifteen] and covetousness of the wife of ane'due south neighbor.[sixteen] [17]

Jesus comments on these commandments in the Gospel of Matthew:

You accept heard that it was said to them of old: M shalt not commit adultery. Simply I say to y'all, that whosoever shall look on a adult female to lust after her, hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.[eighteen]

Jesus also makes reference to the passages from Genesis in his teachings on marriage in Matthew:

Have ye not read, that he who made homo from the starting time, Made them male and female? And he said: For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his married woman, and they two shall be in 1 flesh. Therefore, at present they are not ii, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, allow no homo put asunder. They [the Pharisees] say to him: Why then did Moses control to give a beak of divorce, and to put away? He [Jesus] saith to them: Considering Moses by reason of the hardness of your center permitted you to put away your wives: merely from the start it was not and then.[19]

Patristic theology [edit]

Augustine of Hippo, considered a saint and church male parent past the Catholic Church, having lived a hedonistic lifestyle in his early on youth, later followed the strictly dualistic religion of Manicheanism, which was securely hostile to the material globe, despising sexual practice. Eventually, under the influence of his Catholic Christian female parent Monica, Augustine converted to Christianity, and after wrote movingly of this conversion in his Confessions, including details of the sexually-related aspects. The post-obit passage from his autobiography describes a critical turning signal in his change of sexual morality:

So chop-chop I returned to the place where Alypius was sitting; for in that location had I put down the book of the apostles, when I rose thence. I grasped, opened, and in silence read that paragraph on which my eyes get-go barbarous: "Not in rioting and drunkenness, non in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying; but put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof." [Romans 13:thirteen-14] No further would I read, nor did I need...[20]

Medieval theology [edit]

Thomas Aquinas dealt with sexual morality equally an attribute of the virtue of temperance, and incorporates Scripture throughout his account. In his Summa Theologiae he writes about chastity:

The word "chastity" is employed in two means. Commencement, properly; and thus it is a special virtue having a special thing, namely the concupiscences relating to crabs pleasures. Secondly, the word "chastity" is employed metaphorically: for but as a mingling of bodies conduces to venereal pleasure which is the proper matter of chastity and of animalism its reverse vice, so too the spiritual union of the heed with certain things conduces to a pleasure which is the thing of a spiritual chastity metaphorically speaking, equally well as of a spiritual fornication likewise metaphorically so called. For if the homo mind delight in the spiritual union with that to which it behooves it to be united, namely God, and refrains from delighting in union with other things confronting the requirements of the club established past God, this may be chosen a spiritual chastity, co-ordinate to 2 Cor. xi:2, "I have espoused you to one married man, that I may present you equally a chaste virgin to Christ." If, on the other mitt, the mind exist united to whatever other things whatsoever, against the prescription of the Divine guild, it will be called spiritual fornication, co-ordinate to Jer. iii:1, "But thou hast prostituted thyself to many lovers." Taking chastity in this sense, information technology is a general virtue, because every virtue withdraws the human mind from delighting in a spousal relationship with unlawful things. Withal, the essence of this chastity consists principally in charity and the other theological virtues, whereby the human heed is united to God.[21]

In her Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Sky, Uta Ranke-Heinemann says that three discussions of marriage in the New Attestation (Matthew nineteen, I Corinthians 7, and Ephesians 5:22-32) do not refer to generating children, which later on became consistently emphasized in Catholic moral doctrine as the main purpose of sexual relations, although, according to her, those texts does not point that conceiving children is excluded in wedlock.[22] : 43 The view that union is primarily intended for the purpose of procreation dominated early Christianity,[23] and held by many Church Fathers.[24] [25] During the entire Heart Ages, the question of when intercourse was allowed and when it was not, was very important. Intercourse was prohibited on all Sundays and all the many feast days, too as the 20 days before Christmas, the 40 days before Easter, and often the xx days before Pentecost, equally well as three or more days before receiving Communion (which at that time was offered only a few times a year). These forbidden days altogether totaled about 40% of each yr.[22] : 138 Some church leaders warned believers that children conceived on holy days would be born leprous, epileptic, diabolically possessed, or crippled. Penalties of 20 to twoscore days of strict fasting on staff of life and water were imposed on transgressors.[22] : 139–140 Intercourse was forbidden during the menstrual period and afterward childbirth, since "physicians mistakenly believed that the claret of a menstruating woman or one who has simply given birth was poisonous".[22] : 138 It was as well forbidden during pregnancy, with business organisation for protecting the fetus as the chief reason.[22] : 151–152 "Christian theologians", including Pope Gregory I, held that forbearance should continue until a babe was weaned.[22] : 143

Scholastic theologians from the 11th to 13th centuries shifted the time scheme to motives; the desire to procreate with "joy in a new retainer of God" was considered the best motive for intercourse.[22] : 143 Bertold of Regensburg considered a adult female innocent if she was forced to do information technology on the prohibited times past her husband and she did not will it.[22] : 144 Considering intercourse was just allowed for procreative reasons, various penitentials (rule books) also forbade intercourse between sterile or older partners, although never assigning a punishment.[22] : 151 Heinemann says that oral and anal intercourse were often punished by more years of penance than for premeditated murder, as they prevented formulation from occurring.[22] : 149 Although practise varied, menstruating women were often forbidden to attend Mass or receive Communion, in which the Latin Church took a more moderate stance than the Eastern Churches.[22] : 24 Since the claret from childbirth was believed more harmful than menstrual blood, the Synod of Trier (1227) ruled that women who had just given birth had to exist "reconciled with the Church building" before they immune to enter church. They often could not buried in the cemetery if they died in childbirth before had undergone a purifying ritual, a policy which was rejected by several synods.[22] : 25 The Quango of Trent (1566), and several synods afterwards that, did non impose forbearance from intercourse on certain times as an "obligation", simply as an "admonition".[22] : 145

Early modern theology [edit]

In the Counter-Reformation and early mod periods, theologians connected to write on problems relating to sexual morality and marriage, one example being Giovanni Maria Chiericato (Joannes Clericati) in his Decisiones de Matrimonio.[ citation needed ]

Magisterium since 1930 [edit]

  • Casti connubii (1930) past Pope Pius 11
    • Casti connubii was written in part as a response to the decision of the Anglican Lambeth Conference in 1930 that taught the legitimacy of the use of contraception in some circumstances.
    • "Any employ whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a fashion that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offense against the law of God and of nature, and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin."
  • Humanae vitae (1968) by Pope Paul VI
  • Persona humana (1975) by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Religion
  • Theology of the Torso by Pope John Paul II
  • Evangelium vitae (1995) by Pope John Paul II
  • Donum Vitae (1987) past the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Religion
  • Veritatis splendor (1993) by Pope John Paul 2
  • Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992)
  • Deus caritas est (2005) by Pope Benedict 15
  • Amoris laetitia (2016) past Pope Francis

Dissent [edit]

A report published in 1977,[26] titled Human Sexuality: New Directions in American Catholic Thought, afterward being commissioned in 1972 by the Catholic Theological Society of America (CTSA), which however did non corroborate the written report, showed that dissent from state of the vatican city's teachings on sexuality was common among U.s. theologians. Reaction to the study showed that the dissent was not unanimous and brought about controversies inside the CTSA itself.[27] [28] : 73 In 1979, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Religion publicised an advisory that deplored the books'due south "erroneous conclusions", identified "numerous misreadings of the educational activity of the Second Vatican Council" in it, and said that the book diminished "the morality of sexual love to a matter of 'personal sentiments, feelings, [and] community ... .'"[28] : 74 [29] George Weigel restates that "these theological errors led to practical guidelines that 'either dissociate themselves from or directly contradict Catholic teaching' as taught by the Church's highest instruction authority."[28] : 74

Teachings on specific subjects [edit]

Virgin Mary [edit]

Since the fourth dimension of the church fathers, the church has believed in the perpetual virginity of Mary.[30] In the Litany of Loreto Mary is called the virgin of virgins and queen of virgins.[31] Mary's guiltlessness is considered an example for all Christians to follow by the church.[32] [33]

Virtue [edit]

Guiltlessness [edit]

The Cosmic Church defines guiltlessness as the virtue that moderates the sexual appetite.[34] [35] It refers to the successful integration of sexuality inside the person.[36] Everyone is called to chastity.[half-dozen] Unmarried Catholics express chastity through sexual abstinence. Sexual intercourse within marriage is considered chaste when it retains the twofold significance of wedlock and procreation.[37] Pope John Paul Ii wrote:

At the center of the spirituality of marriage, therefore, there lies guiltlessness not but as a moral virtue (formed by beloved), but likewise equally a virtue connected with the gifts of the Holy Spirit—to a higher place all, the gift of respect for what comes from God (donum pietatis). This gift is in the mind of the writer of the Ephesians when he exhorts married couples to "defer to 1 another out of reverence for Christ" (Eph v:21). So the interior club of married life, which enables the manifestations of affection to develop according to their correct proportion and pregnant, is a fruit non only of the virtue which the couple practice, just also of the gifts of the Holy Spirit with which they cooperate.[38]

Marriage [edit]

Matrimony is a sacrament, and a public commitment between a man and a woman.[39] Marriage builds the family and the society.[6] The Church building considers the expression of love between married man and wife to be an elevated form of human activity, joining hubby and wife in complete, mutual self-giving, and opening their relationship to new life. As Pope Paul VI wrote in Humanae vitae, "The sexual activity, in which husband and wife are intimately and chastely united with one another, through which human life is transmitted, is, every bit the recent Council recalled, 'noble and worthy.'"[twoscore]

Much of the Church'due south detailed doctrines derive from the principle that "sexual pleasure is morally matted when sought for itself, isolated from its procreative and unitive [between spouses] purposes".[41] At the aforementioned time, the Bishops at Vatican 2 decreed that the essential procreative end of marriage does non make "the other purposes of marriage of less business relationship."[42]

Because sexual practice is considered chaste only within context of matrimony, it has come to be chosen the "nuptial human activity" in Catholic discourse. Among Catholics, the nuptial act is considered to be the conjoining of a human being and a adult female through sexual intercourse, considered an act of love between 2 married persons, and is considered in this style, a souvenir from God. When discussing chastity, the Canon lists several transgressions and sins against information technology.[43]

Sins [edit]

Adultery [edit]

One of the ten commandments states: "Do not commit adultery".[44]

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states that two partners commit adultery when they have sexual relations, even transient ones, while at least one of them is married to another political party. There, infidelity is defined as an injustice because it is an injury of the covenant of the union bond, a transgression of the other spouse, an undermining of the institution of marriage and a compromising of the welfare of children who need their parents' stable union.[45]

Child sexual activity abuse and incest [edit]

Incest and kid sex abuse are counted as sins in the church building's catechism in paragraphs 2388–2389.[46]

Contraception [edit]

The Church has been opposed to contraception for equally far back equally one can historically trace.[47] [48] Many early Catholic Church building Fathers made statements condemning the use of contraception including John Chrysostom, Jerome, Clement of Alexandria, Hippolytus of Rome, Augustine of Hippo and diverse others.[49] [50] [51] Among the condemnations is one by Jerome which refers to an apparent oral course of contraception: "Some go then far every bit to have potions, that they may insure barrenness, and thus murder human beings almost before their conception."[52] The Canon specifies that all marriage acts must exist both unitive and procreative.[53] In addition to condemning utilise of bogus birth control as intrinsically evil,[54] non-procreative sexual practice acts such as mutual masturbation and anal sex are ruled out as ways to avoid pregnancy.[55]

Pope Paul Half dozen, rejecting the majority report of the 1963–66 Pontifical Commission on Birth Control, confirmed the Catholic Church's traditional teaching on contraception, divers as "every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal human action, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or every bit a means, to render procreation impossible",[56] declaring information technology evil, and excluded. Prohibited acts with contraceptive effect include sterilization, condoms and other bulwark methods, spermicides, coitus interruptus (withdrawal method), the Pill, and all other such methods.[57] Restricting sexual activity to times when conception is unlikely (natural family planning and similar practices) is not accounted sinful.[58] The Catechism of the Catholic Church says that the spacing of births may be practiced for "just reasons" and non "motivated by selfishness".[59]

John Paul Two said in Familiaris consortio,

Thus the innate linguistic communication that expresses the total reciprocal cocky-giving of husband and married woman is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads non only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to requite itself in personal totality.... the difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the bicycle . . . involves in the concluding analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of homo sexuality.[60]

In January 2015, during his render flight from a visit to the Philippines, Pope Francis was asked by a High german journalist for his thoughts on the findings of some polls that about Filipinos think the population growth in the land, with each adult female having on average three children, is one of the main reasons for its poverty, and that many there disagree with Cosmic pedagogy on contraception. He replied that the key is "responsible parenthood":

Some people remember that—alibi my expression here—that in gild to be good Catholics we have to exist like rabbits. No. Responsible parenthood. This is articulate and that is why in the Church there are marriage groups, there are experts in this matter, there are pastors, one tin can search; and I know so many means that are licit and that have helped this.[61]

He also said that Pope Paul VI's pedagogy was prophetic, in view of the drop of the birth rate in some countries to little more than than 1 child per adult female.[62]

Medical use [edit]

The Church does not consider at all illicit the use of those therapeutic means necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should effect therefrom, then long as the contraceptive effect is not straight intended for any motive whatsoever.[63] For instance, the use of female person steroid hormones as treatment for endometriosis rather than with contraceptive intent is non considered to disharmonize in any manner with Cosmic educational activity.[64] Moral theologians call this the principle of double effect.[65]

The apply of condoms to prevent disease is a more controversial and more than complex outcome, with theologians arguing both sides.[66] [67] [68] Unlike drugs and surgical procedures, the Church building'south position as of 2013[update] was that using condoms during sex, for any purpose, is morally contraceptive and thus a sin.[ citation needed ]

Issues surrounding the Catholic Church and AIDS became highly controversial since 1990, primarily because many prominent Catholic leaders publicly declared their opposition to the use of condoms as a illness preventative. Other issues involve religious participation in global health care services and collaboration with secular organizations such every bit UNAIDS and the Globe Health Organisation.[ citation needed ]

In November 2010 Pope Benedict said that it was a responsible act, though still non a truly moral solution, to utilize condoms in some very special cases as a device for the prevention of disease. He gave male prostitutes equally an instance, where the purpose is to "reduce the hazard of infection" from HIV.[69] While still assertive that contraceptive devices interfere with the creation of life, the Pope stated that in that item case, it can be a responsible human activity to raise awareness of the nature of such an act, and as a benefit, to avoid decease and relieve life, though only as a commencement step, not a truly moral solution, before convincing the male prostitute of a truly moral solution, which means ceasing prostitution and sexual activity outside of wedlock. There was some confusion at first whether the statement applied only to homosexual prostitutes and thus not to heterosexual intercourse at all. However, Federico Lombardi, spokesman of the Vatican, clarified that it practical to heterosexual and transsexual prostitutes, both male and female, equally well.[lxx] He likewise clarified that, in the interview, the Pope did not reverse the Church'south centuries-old prohibition on contraceptive use in the context of heterosexual sexual acts, which the Church states must ever exist open up to the transmission of life,[69] and that he did not reverse his positions on homosexual acts and prostitution either.[ citation needed ]

Fornication [edit]

The Cosmic Church disapproves of fornication (sexual intercourse between 2 people not married to each other), calling it "gravely reverse to the nobility of persons and of human sexuality".[71]

Homosexuality [edit]

The Catechism devotes a separate section to homosexuality within its explanation of the sixth commandment. The Church distinguishes between "homosexual attractions", which are non considered sinful, and "homosexual acts", which are considered sinful. Similar all heterosexual acts outside of marriage, homosexual acts are considered sins against this commandment. The Canon states that they "violate natural law, cannot bring forth life, and exercise non proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be canonical."[72] [73] [74] The Church teaches that a homosexual inclination is "objectively disordered" and can be a great trial for the person for whom the Church teaches must be "accepted with respect, pity and sensitivity ... unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided."[72] [75] [74]

The homosexual person is, according to the Church building, "called to chastity". They are instructed to do the virtues of "self-mastery" that teaches "inner freedom" using the support of friends, prayer and grace found in the sacraments of the Church.[72] These tools are meant to help the homosexually inclined person to "gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection", which is a land to which all Christians are called.[72]

On 26 August 2018, Pope Francis said in Ireland that homosexual people have existed throughout the entire history of humankind. He teaches Cosmic parents to talk with their homosexual children and that they are office of their families and should not be "thrown out" of the family.[76] On 27 Baronial 2018 a press argument past Pope Francis declared that homosexuality is not an illness.[77] [78] [79]

Lust [edit]

The Cosmic Church disapproves of lust: "Sexual pleasure is morally disordered when sought for itself, isolated from its procreative and unitive purposes".[41]

But I say to you, everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart.[Matthew v:28]

Masturbation [edit]

The Catholic Church building disapproves of masturbation.[80] Thomas Aquinas, ane of the about prominent Doctors of the Cosmic Church, wrote that masturbation was an "unnatural vice" which is a species of lust", but that it is a less serious form than bestiality, which is "the most serious", and than sodomy, which is the next about serious:[81] "By procuring pollution [i.e., ejaculation apart from intercourse], without whatsoever copulation, for the sake of venereal pleasance ... pertains to the sin of 'uncleanness' which some call 'effeminacy' [Latin: mollitiem, lit. 'softness, unmanliness']."[82]

More recently, from the Youcat:

409 Masturbation is an offense against honey, considering it makes the excitement of sexual pleasure an end in itself and uncouples it from the holistic unfolding of honey between a homo and a woman. That is why "sex with yourself" is a contradiction in terms. The Church does not demonize masturbation, simply she warns confronting trivializing information technology. In fact many immature people and adults are in danger of becoming isolated in their consumption of lewd pictures, films, and Internet services instead of finding love in a personal relationship. Loneliness tin can lead to a blind alley in which masturbation becomes an addiction. Living by the motto "For sexual activity I practice not demand anyone; I volition take it myself, notwithstanding and whenever I demand information technology" makes nobody happy.[83]

According to Cosmic Church teaching, "to course an equitable judgment about the subjects' moral responsibleness and to guide pastoral action, one must take into account the affective immaturity, force of acquired addiction, conditions of anxiety, or other psychological or social factors that lessen or fifty-fifty extenuate moral culpability."[fourscore]

Pornography [edit]

The Catholic Church disapproves of pornography and says that ceremonious regime should forbid the production and distribution of pornographic materials.[84]

Prostitution [edit]

The Catholic Church building condemns prostitution every bit a societal vice.[85]

Rape [edit]

The Cosmic Church condemns rape equally "always an intrinsically evil act."[86]

Come across besides [edit]

  • Women in the Catholic Church

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b Catechism of the Cosmic Church building (2d ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 1954.
  2. ^ Canon of the Cosmic Church building (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2369.
  3. ^ Catechism of the Cosmic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 1643.
  4. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 1617.
  5. ^ Genesis i:31
  6. ^ a b c "Love and Sexuality", USCCB
  7. ^ Pontifical Council for the Family. "The Truth and meaning of human sexuality", §3, December 8, 1995
  8. ^ Canon of the Catholic Church building (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2396.
  9. ^ Canon of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2400.
  10. ^ "Summa Theologica: text - IntraText CT". Retrieved half-dozen January 2015.
  11. ^ Genesis 1:27
  12. ^ Genesis two:21–25
  13. ^ Genesis 3:sixteen
  14. ^ Exodus twenty:14
  15. ^ Deuteronomy v:18
  16. ^ Exodus 20:17
  17. ^ Deuteronomy 5:21
  18. ^ Matthew 5:27-28
  19. ^ Matthew xix:4-8
  20. ^ St. Augustine, Confessions, Volume viii, Chapter 12
  21. ^ St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, II-2, Question 151, Article 2, corp.
  22. ^ a b c d due east f g h i j k 50 yard Ranke-Heinemann, Uta (1990). Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Sky. Doubleday Publishing. OL 21337088M.
  23. ^ Salzman, Todd A.; Lawler, Michael Thou. (2008). The Sexual Person: Toward a Renewed Catholic Anthropology. Georgetown University Press. p. 175. ISBN9781589017269.
  24. ^ Obach, Robert (2008). The Catholic Church on Marital Intercourse: From St. Paul to Pope John Paul Two. Lexington Books. pp. 22–26. ISBN9780739130896.
  25. ^ Hunter, David Thousand., ed. (2001). Marriage in the Early Church. Wipf and Stock Publishers. pp. 12–28. ISBN9781579108274.
  26. ^ A.Kosnik and others, Human Sexuality. New Directions in Catholic Idea, Search Press, London 1977, pp. 219-229
  27. ^ Charles Eastward. Curran; Richard A. McCormick (1999). The Historical Evolution of Fundamental Moral Theology in the U.s.. Paulist Press. p. 26. ISBN978-0-8091-3879-1.
  28. ^ a b c George Weigel (xv October 2007). Courage to Be Catholic: Crunch, Reform, and the Future of the Church. Basic Books. ISBN978-0-465-00994-seven.
  29. ^ Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Religion (thirteen July 1979). "Observations about the book ""Man Sexuality". A report commissioned by the Catholic Theological Society of America, Rev. Anthony Kosnik editor"".
  30. ^ CCC 496-507
  31. ^ Loreto Litanies
  32. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church (2d ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 967.
  33. ^ Didactics Ecclesiae Sponsae Imago on the Ordo Virgium 26
  34. ^ Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologia I-Two q. 60 a. 5
  35. ^ Melody, John. "Chastity." The Catholic Encyclopedia Vol. 3. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908. 13 July 2019Public Domain This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  36. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2337.
  37. ^ Humanae vitae 12
  38. ^ Pope John Paul Two, General Audience, Wednesday, November fourteen, 1984.
  39. ^ "Wedlock: Love and Life in the Divine Program", USCCB, November 2009
  40. ^ Paul VI (25 July 1968). "Humanae Vitae - Encyclical Letter of the alphabet of His Holiness Paul VI on the regulation of birth, 25 July 1968". Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  41. ^ a b Canon of the Cosmic Church (2d ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2351.
  42. ^ "Gaudium et spes". world wide web.vatican.va. 50. Retrieved 2017-12-29 .
  43. ^ Catechism of the Cosmic Church building (2d ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraphs 2337–2350.
  44. ^ Catechism of the Cosmic Church (second ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2072.
  45. ^ Catechism of the Cosmic Church (2d ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraphs 2380–2381.
  46. ^ Catechism of the Cosmic Church (second ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraphs 2388–2389.
  47. ^ "Fathers Know Best Contraception". EWTN. Archived from the original on 2019-05-20. Retrieved 2009-03-20 .
  48. ^ "Contraception/Birth Control". Byzantines.net. Archived from the original on 2008-04-xix. Retrieved 2009-03-20 .
  49. ^ ""This Stone" Magazine". Archived from the original on 20 May 2019. Retrieved vi January 2015.
  50. ^ "Fr. Hardon Archives - The Cosmic Tradition on the Morality of Contraception". Retrieved vi January 2015.
  51. ^ Dave Armstrong. "Biblical Evidence for Catholicism: Contraception: Early on Church Teaching (William Klimon)". Archived from the original on 5 September 2008. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  52. ^ "CHURCH FATHERS: Letter 22 (Jerome)". Retrieved 6 Jan 2015.
  53. ^ Catechism of the Cosmic Church building (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2366.
  54. ^ Catechism of the Cosmic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2370.
  55. ^ Christopher West (2000). Proficient News about Sex and Marriage: Answers to Your Honest Questions about Cosmic Instruction. Retainer Publications. pp. 88–91. ISBNi-56955-214-2.
  56. ^ Paul Half dozen (25 July 1968). "Humanae Vitae - Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Paul VI on the regulation of birth, 25 July 1968". Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  57. ^ "Birth Control". Archived from the original on 2016-xi-29. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  58. ^ Pope Paul VI (25 July 1968). "Humanae vitae". Archived from the original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  59. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church building (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraphs 2368–2369.
  60. ^ "Familiaris consortio". 22 November 1981. Retrieved 6 Jan 2015.
  61. ^ Holdren, Alan; Gagliarducci, Andrea. "Full text of Pope's in-flight interview from Manila to Rome". Catholic News Bureau . Retrieved 21 Jan 2015.
  62. ^ Holdren, Alan. "Pope: 'Responsible parenthood' doesn't mean nascency command". Catholic News Bureau . Retrieved 21 Jan 2015.
  63. ^ Paul Half-dozen (25 July 1968). "Humanae Vitae - Encyclical Letter of the alphabet of His Holiness Paul Half-dozen on the regulation of nascence, 25 July 1968". Archived from the original on xix March 2011. Retrieved vi January 2015.
  64. ^ Hardon, John (2000). "Endometriosis". Modern Catholic Dictionary. Eternal Life. ISBN0-9672989-2-X.
  65. ^ "FAQs from the 2012 CMA Annual Conference". The Linacre Quarterly. 84 (iii): 296–314. August i, 2018. doi:10.1080/00243639.2017.1330614. ISSN 0024-3639. PMC5592310. PMID 28912621.
  66. ^ James T. Bretzke, S.J. (26 March 2007). "The Lesser Evil". America Mag . Retrieved 2015-02-02 .
  67. ^ Guevin, Benedict; Martin Rhonheimer (Spring 2005). "Debate: On the Employ of Condoms to Prevent Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome". The National Cosmic Bioethics Quarterly: 35–48.
  68. ^ May, William E. (Summer–Fall 2007). "The Theological Significance of Consummation of Marriage, Contraception, Using Condoms to Forestall HIV, and Aforementioned-Sex Unions". Josephinum Journal of Theology. Pittsfield, Massachusetts: Catholic Library Association. 14 (two): 207–217.
  69. ^ a b Jonathan Wynne-Jones (20 Nov 2010). "The Pope drops Cosmic ban on condoms in celebrated shift". London: The Tepegraph. Archived from the original on 22 Nov 2010. Retrieved 20 November 2010.
  70. ^ Donadio, Rachel; Goodstein, Laurie (23 November 2010). "Vatican Confirms Shift on Condoms as AIDS Prevention". The New York Times.
  71. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2353.
  72. ^ a b c d Catechism of the Cosmic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraphs 2357–2359.
  73. ^ Schreck, Alan (1999). The Essential Catholic Catechism. Servant Publications. p. 314. ISBN1-56955-128-6.
  74. ^ a b Scrimenti, Stephen M., ed. (2005). Catholic Social Ethics. Xulon Press. pp. 149–150. ISBNone-597811-19X.
  75. ^ Kreeft, Peter (2001). Catholic Christianity. Ignatius Printing. p. 249. ISBN0-89870-798-6.
  76. ^ Rheinische Post: Eltern sollen ihre homosexuellen Kinder nicht verurteilen (german)
  77. ^ Spiegel.de: Vatikan zieht umstrittene Äußerung zu homosexuellen Kindern zurück
  78. ^ Tagesspiegel.de:Vatikan ändert Papst-Zitate zu homosexuellen Neigungen von Kindern
  79. ^ Deutschlandfunk.de: Vatikan relativiert Papst-Äußerungen zu Homosexualität, abgerufen am 28. August 2018
  80. ^ a b Catechism of the Cosmic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2352.
  81. ^ Summa Theologica IIª-IIae, q. 154 a. 12 ad 4 (in Latin)
  82. ^ Summa Theologica IIª-IIae, q. 154 a. 11 co. (in Latin)
  83. ^ "FAQ - YOUCAT.usa". Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  84. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church building (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2354.
  85. ^ Canon of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2355.
  86. ^ Canon of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.). Libreria Editrice Vaticana. 2019. Paragraph 2356.

External links [edit]

  • "Sex activity & the Early Church" past Sam Torode

tidwellcargay.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_theology_of_sexuality

0 Response to "Sign of Contradiction: Contraception, Family Planning, and Catholicism"

Publicar un comentario

Suscribirse a: Comentarios de la entrada (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel